I rarely give over my space to a writer that does not have the last name Burchett. But faithful and long-suffering reader Steve sent me a link to an article by Wheel of Fortune game show host Pat Sajak. Pat may need Vanna’s help to turn letters but he does a really nice job of arranging them into a thoughtful piece posted at his site.
There is much debate in the gay community on the subject of “outing”; that is, disclosing someone’s homosexuality without his consent. As with most debates, there are two extreme positions and a middle position. On one extreme are those who think anyone is fair game, and no one has any business keeping his true sexuality under wraps. The other extreme believes it’s a very personal matter, and “outing” is absolutely wrong. Besides which, many of these absolutists find the practice counter-productive in their quest for gay rights. There is, however, a growing in-between position which says “outing” is justified if the person being exposed is a hypocrite. For example, if a crusading moralist or an anti-gay marriage Congressman is leading a secret gay life, it’s okay to make that public.
I would be in favor of that middle position if we could apply it across the board. In other words, if we’re going to “out” hypocrites, let’s go all the way. If a Congressman opposes school choice for his poorer constituents while sending his own kids to private schools, let’s “out” him. If a politician or celebrity complains our taxes aren’t high enough while he hires the most aggressive accountants to minimize his own taxes, or takes questionable deductions to do the same, by all means, let’s “out” him. Minimum wage? Illegal immigration? Does their public stand match their private actions when it comes to their own domestic help? If not, “out” ‘em.
What about those who want to legislate diversity in our schools and clubs and organizations and work places? Great, but let’s check out their offices and club memberships and circles of acquaintance and make sure they don’t need to be “outed” as well. Let’s take a close look at our rich members of Congress (and there are a lot of them) who speak out about a middle class crisis, and let’s be sure they (and their family business entities) treat all their employees with the same generosity they would demand of others (salary, benefits, health care, etc.). Otherwise, “out” they go!
Let’s make sure Second Amendment opponents (or their bodyguards) don’t own guns. Let’s be certain those who complain about executives’ wages apply the same standards to themselves. Let’s change the rules to make every law Congress passes apply to its members as well. If not, “out”, “out”, “out”.
Let’s “out” the Hollywood star who lectures us on the environment while living in multiple homes, flying in private jets and riding around in limousines, or the athlete who rails against government neglect of the poor while lending his name to $100-plus basketball shoes marketed at that same audience.
Most people keep more than their sexuality in the closet. So, if we’re going to open that door to root out hypocrisy, let’s open them all.
Pat Sajak nicely summarizes our amazing ability to deceive ourselves. That is why Jesus was so harsh with the “religious” types of His day.
- “You’re hopeless, you religion scholars and Pharisees! Frauds! You keep meticulous account books, tithing on every nickel and dime you get, but on the meat of God’s Law, things like fairness and compassion and commitment—the absolute basics!—you carelessly take it or leave it. Careful bookkeeping is commendable, but the basics are required. Do you have any idea how silly you look, writing a life story that’s wrong from start to finish, nitpicking over commas and semicolons? You’re hopeless, you religion scholars and Pharisees! Frauds! You burnish the surface of your cups and bowls so they sparkle in the sun, while the insides are maggoty with your greed and gluttony. Stupid Pharisee! Scour the insides, and then the gleaming surface will mean something.” Matthew 23 The Message
I am still learning not to deceive myself. I am quite capable of shining the exterior while covering a maggoty interior. So I will out myself. I am a recovering hypocrite. I will never be fully healed. And that is awesome! Because if I could be healed I wouldn’t have to depend on my relationship with Jesus and the daily inspection of the Holy Spirit.
So, in honor of Pat Sajak, today’s puzzle is about deception. And the question is simple.
H Y P O C R _ T E S
“Jesus, is there an “I” in there?”
SDS in Canada
I think we need to realize before we judge others that we are not God, (all knowing and omnipotent), and so we are not really qualified to judge. God knows the heart and motive of each person, where we do not. That is why God can judge people.
I do agree with Pat Sajak, though, that sometimes we need to confront a person if they are in a position of authority and their stated beliefs and their actions do not line up and people are being hurt.
I guess my point is, we as Christians have a standard set before us that we should try to live up to, but at the same time realize that we can’t possibly do it on our own. That is where Grace comes in. God judges us, but we are covered in the blood of Jesus and so are not judged with the harshness we deserve. In turn, instead of judging others we need to extend that same grace and mercy and compassion to them. That is where we can be the hands and feet of Jesus.
Shawn - Ohio
NTKBO:
Maybe you should read:
"When Bad Christians Happen to Good People" by, Eh-hem, Dave Burchett, Chapter 6
Shawn:
Done. My point, in my most humblest of opinions, still stands.
Maybe I’m not following your point, or knowing me, missing it entirely. But I think the BIG picture from Biblical teaching is God being the father and telling his children to "do as I say, not as I do". Granted, there are several examples worthy of following, but there are also other examples that, IMO, are not.
[T]he Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son: John 5:22
He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day. John 12:48
And once that door, "the word that I have spoken", is opened up, it appears that the whole of the Bible is set forth as judgment.
Am I reading it incorrectly?
NTKBO
"Should not, as an example laid out by Jesus/God/et al, that we judge? I mean, ultimately. In the end, does not a Christian God lay before mankind, to be Christ-like, insist we judge?"
-Shawn
Maybe you should read:
"When Bad Christians Happen to Good People" by, Eh-hem, Dave Burchett, Chapter 6
Shawn from Ohio
I’ve been home with my sick daughter all day and have been thinking about this topic off-n-on throughout the day…
I know that some Christians don’t believe in the existence of a hell, but for those that DO, wouldn’t that logic be the ultimate "outing" of a "sinful" nature and pretty much go against the teaching of a "Christ"?
Put aside the issue of a hell being torture and not punishment for "bad" behavior; if there is an "ultimate judgment", didn’t "God" put that system into place? Would that not be viewed as an example?
Should not, as an example laid out by Jesus/God/et al, that we judge? I mean, ultimately. In the end, does not a Christian God lay before mankind, to be Christ-like, insist we judge?
Is it wrong to BE hypocritical? Sure, I guess; It would certainly be a bad "lead-by-example". But we let slide those that guide/rule/govern us all the time. Are we, as a human race, being hypocritical in ALLOWING our own hypocrisy to flourish before us?
Compromise anyone? 🙂 Kinda throws a monkey-wrench into the works, doesn’t it….
Dave, you’ve done it again; making me think and whatnot….sheesh. 🙂
-Shawn
A drop of reason in a sea of faith.
Shawn from Ohio
Quite an interesting topic for one that does not believe in sin, especially towards, well, you know. 🙂
I wonder why we, as humans, feel the need to "out" someone? To be able to say "Look at me, I’m better than that guy ’cause…"? Is it for power?
What if we "out" to get the issue ‘on the table’? Or maybe we shouldn’t question? I’m more than a little leery of being satisfied with not understanding the world (and people) around me. What if we only "outed" issues?
Thought provoking topic, Dave. Thanks.
-Shawn
A drop of reason in a sea of faith.
Cheryl
Hi there.
Pretending to be something while actually being something else is definitely wrong. In matters of religion, I believe that it is evil, however I agree that we are not suppose to judge or cast stones. This is a difficult subject for me because I have been victimized by hypocrites in the church and in the Christian media.
I am still struggling with my own two lives though, Dave.
Josh Harrison
Yo, I really dig what you are doing here. I plan on coming back again and again. Very real stuff going on here.
Peace,
Josh
Sharon
Thanks for the reminder. I am constantly fighting my "inner Pharisee".
*
“He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her.”
spoken by Jesus to the Pharisees who brought him a prostitute to be stoned